UFO FORUMS

Is there any uk ufo groups in the uk aroundmthe worcestershire area or maybe local forums

Ne1 there

Hello

Thanks Malc; you enjoy, and take care. Til' the next time...

Cor blimey Rob, 1 hour has yet again clocked on by, how can this be? can I thank you for your attendance, I am sure we'll be in touch again sometime soon, moving on in the direction of a full English, good day my Friend!

It's more commercial than domestic; bars, hotels, and the like. A good quality Kitchen will last a long time, if looked after.

Any large amounts of Furniture SOLD to the highest bidder? we had a brand new kitchen back in 1997, still looks amazing

Sound! I have an job that keeps me indoors, most of the time, so no, but it's been a very nice year!

Heeey have you been catching any rays with this fabbo weather? I was out yesterday in Kew Gardens all day (N Circ, London)

Sorry, yes, you're right.

Comes back to my original point, he fears being portrayed "as a nut", he does but never mind, we can see his shows anyway

I think he's got a point. I've seen others that have been portrayed in a bad light, simply because of the 'cut'.

Well I think he's asking too much, compromise has to be in there somewhere surely. he's missing a golden opportunity here, shame

No. That's not it. In a nutshell, R.D.H want's to have the final say on the edit, because he knows that otherwise he'll be misrepresented, but the producers won't allow him that.

Yeah but you didn't say why he refuses to go on mainstream TV. is it because he fears being portrayed "as a nut"? I guess there is always that risk

I think that's why R.D.H has diversified.

Sure is, but the focus goes on here

Yes, it's a shame...

Ahhhh you saw my bulletun nineyearson.html did ya? yeah it is, check out those stats

Will do. Do you think that interest in the 'Topic' is fading?

Problem we have Rob is that there are X many sites out there just like this one , check out the top ten viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1233 as an example, that's the issue

I note that there are not many active members here? Anything you can do about that?

He won't go on mainstream TV with this stuff?

No. The M.S.M has an agenda and R.D.H does not trust them. Again, you need to have been following him for some time to know that back story.

Has R D H ever got a slot on a national broadcasting TV channel, I would have thought ITV would have snapped him up

That's yet another thing... But, I'm a little suspect of some of the photos in the PDF, where R.D.H tries to id some of the rocks from different pictures. You'll see what I mean, if you read it.

Of course and then the next part is "The fossil hunting guide to Mars" a planet full of fossils (very similar to fossils found on Earth)

Well, it fuels his reasoning; that they can't be on Mars

That's the conclusion of the 2 bloggers, love that section of the show, dynamite

Real Time faster than light comms!! Wow!!!!

No I spent so much time watching his show I didn't get to the PDF

Did you read the PDF that goes with it?

The Mars thing is very odd...

The 2010 Blog explores the software contained on the Mars lander for creating a time stamping thumbnails (photos), they discovered that another section of JPL is in real time comms with SPIRIT

falkor wrote: Chop on a reply to this viewtopic.php?f=4&p=6968#p6968 which is the topic

Will do...

He has put an enormous amount of effort in. my favourite is the 2010 Blog discovered a year ago by 2 JPL engineers working on the Mars Lander SPIRIT, love that

I think what's missing is that fact that whoever was controlling the 'planes' was not concerned about what the safe operating speeds were for that height and R.D.H notes that the speed was outside of those speeds.

Chop on a reply to this viewtopic.php?f=4&p=6968#p6968 which is the topic

Well not according to his presentation (which by the way is pretty easy to watch if you have the time)

Yes, I see, and yes, I remember now... The speed thing is very much 'up for debate' as I've done some research and it's far from conclusive.

He goes further, he suggests a Missile and then takes a look at what missiles were available that year, he says "a 767 travelling at 500mph into the tower" he tells us that that was the speed, then goes onto quote an aviation expert who categorically denies that at sea level a civilian passenger jet can achieve such a speed at sea level

falkor wrote: Okay the bloke is fairly aloof but he is saying they're not planes, they just look like planes, we have been deceived, the imagery was put in place, he doesn't say how, that IS making a judgement, MORNING DAVE - you are WELCOME here

Does he say that? Hummm I'll have to watch it again. My take was that he says that something hit, but it may or may not have been that 'planes' that we're told, hit.

Okay the bloke is fairly aloof but he is saying they're not planes, they just look like planes, we have been deceived, the imagery was put in place, he doesn't say how, that IS making a judgement, MORNING DAVE - you are WELCOME here

Darn that 'auto correct'...

rob42 wrote:

falkor wrote: So do you believe his most controversial on 9/11, you say he doesn't make a judgement but he clearly does

Could you be more spastic?

Opps!!! Sorry. Typo!!! >Specific<

More what?

falkor wrote: So do you believe his most controversial on 9/11, you say he doesn't make a judgement but he clearly does

Could you be more spastic?

I know, I have watched it twice, the butter planes, they melt into the tower, I still find it hard to believe, who gains from this?

It's a VERY wide ranging topic with many facets. All I can say is listen to what he and his guests have to say and make your own judgment. One of the things that he's done is a very good presentation on the flight paths of the planes that hit the second Tower.

So do you believe his most controversial on 9/11, you say he doesn't make a judgement but he clearly does